bruce_hh

Number of posts: 4432 Age: 64 Location: Monterey, California, U.S.A. Points: 4931 Registration date: 2008-10-22
 | Subject: Bruce's Sonnet #5 (Two Versions) Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:49 am | |
| V ['original version'] We're all conceived beneath the worst of stars, and all our acts are bound to bear bad fruit. No matter how we struggle, life's grim scars keep showing we're unwholesome to the root. Such webs of circumstance envelop us, we soon feel doomed to nothing but despair. Our bother, hurry, misery, and fuss allow us little chance to grow aware. Yet, though we slog like madmen to our graves and scarcely heed the ruin we create, we have our joys and each of us behaves with more nobility than words can state. If life is hopeless, we can still be glad some goodness prospers even in what's bad.
5 ['streamlined version'] That sorry skies quite govern how we're hatched compels our every act to bear bad fruit whose many miseries must breed a patched confusion that does little but pollute. Sad circumstances re-envelop us and quickly doom our worlds and make despair perform a frolicking that is a fuss that undermines life's wish to conquer care. We somehow madly reach decrepit graves and scarcely heed the ruin we create but also somehow form ferocious waves that say that nobleness must be our state. Life's hopelessness apparently permits a badness that includes a grace that fits. |
|
antropolis

Number of posts: 879 Age: 37 Location: Garland, Tx Points: 1587 Registration date: 2009-11-27
 | Subject: Re: Bruce's Sonnet #5 (Two Versions) Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:26 am | |
| Hey Bruce I enjoyed reading the original version and the streamlined version of your fifth sonnet. Good sonnets. ~Scott |
|
bruce_hh

Number of posts: 4432 Age: 64 Location: Monterey, California, U.S.A. Points: 4931 Registration date: 2008-10-22
 | Subject: Re: Bruce's Sonnet #5 (Two Versions) Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:43 pm | |
| Dear **Scott**: Many thanks! My efforts as 'a sonneteer' I take seriously; however, I somehow must practically know that the English language remains far beyond me. The 'SONNET FORM' ---- however ---- may permit some raaaaather purposive striving? Thank you again. |
|